Technical description of the Slvador Dali painting metamorphose de Essay

Technical description of the Slvador Dali painting metamorphose de narcisse - Essay Example The essay "Salvador Dali - Metamorphose de Narcisse" explores the painting of Salvador Dali, Metamorphose de Narcisse. He deliberately cultivated delusions similar to those of paranoiacs in the cause of wresting hallucinatory images from his conscious mind. Dali's images - his bent watches, his figures, halfhuman, half chest of drawers – have made him the most famous of all Surrealist painters†. Typically painting images he saw in dreams or nightmares and consistently pushing the envelope in terms of subject matter, Dali had a wide range of interests that became reflected in his artwork. These characteristics can be more fully understood by examining one of his better-known paintings such as â€Å"Metamorphose de Narcisse† which translates to â€Å"Metamorphosis of Narcissus† in English. Created in 1937, this painting falls without question into the Surrealist style. Part of the definition of Surrealism relies upon a heavy fantasy content, typically as it i s revealed through the images of the subconscious, as well as an established connection with the world of which we are all aware. â€Å"The Surrealists tried to create a new art mythology by fusing conscious with unconscious levels of the mind". Through this terminology, it becomes immediately apparent that the work of Sigmund Freud, who had but recently published his ideas regarding the three-tiered nature of the human mind, was tremendously important to the creation of Surrealist art. As the above definition indicates, most artists, including Dali.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis - Assignment Example s to be drawn in some cases where procedures are considered unethical, especially, where couples create savior siblings aimed at saving a seriously sick sibling. Even though the engineered child does not get physically harmed and does not benefit, the implication of this procedure is morally unethical. It is not fair for couples to have a second child with the sole purpose of serving as a donor while disregarding his/her right to equality. Having a donor child resembles slavery where the savior child is regarded the slave while the parents are the slave-owner. The parents own the child and use him/her as a commodity but, the child is a person who requires respect. There also has to be a limit to this because there are higher risks of long-term and psychological impact on the second child. The child’s identity is likely to be impaired because of being viewed as a tool that is solely designed to save another life. The child is also likely to lack self-respect and self-esteem as he/she is likely to get praised for being a means to achieve a particular end rather than for his/her individual value. A line should also be drawn in cases where parents abuse PGD to meet their selfish needs of creating a perfect child. Avoiding genetic disorders to protect someone’s life is one thing but, it is another to transform a person artificially (Hayes, 2008). Some parents pick traits that they find to be beneficial and get rid of those that they find imperfect, so they satisfy their goals of not having socially and financially burdensome child. The reasoning is wrong because it is a direct discrimination against disabled children. Ethically, this also violates the core value of humanity by treating a child as a means towards an inappropriate end. The child’s well-being is ignored while the parents’ economic and social ends are being pursued. Designing a child destructs their will and fails to treat them humanely (Cummings, 2009). PGD has given couples opportunities to